10/10 points: Provide a valid pubspec.yaml

5/5 points: Provide a valid README.md

5/5 points: Provide a valid CHANGELOG.md

10/10 points: Use an OSI-approved license

Detected license: MIT.

0/10 points: 20% or more of the public API has dartdoc comments

0 out of 4 API elements (0.0 %) have documentation comments.

Providing good documentation for libraries, classes, functions, and other API elements improves code readability and helps developers find and use your API. Document at least 20% of the public API elements.

To highlight public API members missing documentation consider enabling the public_member_api_docs lint.

Some symbols that are missing documentation: flutter_desktop_folder_picker, flutter_desktop_folder_picker.FlutterDesktopFolderPicker, flutter_desktop_folder_picker.FlutterDesktopFolderPicker.FlutterDesktopFolderPicker.new, flutter_desktop_folder_picker.FlutterDesktopFolderPicker.openFolderPickerDialog.

10/10 points: Package has an example

20/20 points: Supports 2 of 6 possible platforms (iOS, Android, Web, Windows, macOS, Linux)

• ✓ Windows

• ✓ macOS

These platforms are not supported:

These issues are present but do not affect the score, because they may not originate in your package:

0/0 points: Swift Package Manager support

This package for iOS or macOS does not support the Swift Package Manager. It will not receive full points in a future version of the scoring model.

See https://docs.flutter.dev/to/spm for details.

50/50 points: code has no errors, warnings, lints, or formatting issues

10/10 points: All of the package dependencies are supported in the latest version

To reproduce run dart pub outdated --no-dev-dependencies --up-to-date --no-dependency-overrides.

10/10 points: Package supports latest stable Dart and Flutter SDKs

20/20 points: Compatible with dependency constraint lower bounds

pub downgrade does not expose any static analysis error.